Click image to donate

Click image to donate
Click Image to Donate: DoublePortionInheritance@gmail.com

Wednesday, June 1, 2011

The King James Version Versus Modern Translations

by Maria Merola אריאל
© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, September 2002, May 2011


This article is for the express purpose of comparing the “Authorized Version” of the Bible (aka King James Version) to all of the other modern translations that are being peddled in bookstores today. I did this research and wrote this article in the year 2002 before I realized the name Jesus Christ was not the true name of our Messiah. Today I no longer use the incorrect name of Jesus or the title “Christ.” The Greek title “Christos” was used for all of the false pagan gods of Greece.  Hence “Christos” is a poor substitution for the title “Messiah” or Mashiyach in Hebrew which means “the anointed one.” 

In this article, my aim is to expose the “New Age Bible Versions” that have an agenda to change the identity of our Messiah into Satan himself! In this expose, I will be using some of the vain titles for our Creator such as “Lord, God, Jesus & Christ,” but only because I am trying to show the differences between the modern translations versus the King James Version. Usually in all of my articles, I use the original Hebrew Sacred name of YaHuWaH for our Creator and YaHuW’shuwa for the Messiah. My main goal is to illustrate the differences between the King James Version of the Bible versus all other modern translations such as:

New American Standard Version (NASB), New Living Translation (NLT), English Standard Version (ESV), New International Version (NIV), The Complete Jewish Bible (CJB), and the New King James Version (NKJV), Good News for Modern Man, Revised Standard Version (RSV), The New Living Bible (NLB), English Revised Version (ERV).

All of these modern translations listed above use the corrupted Greek Septuagint for the Old Testament which was drastically altered by a man named Origen in the 2nd Century. Origen was a “Gnostic” which is someone who does not believe that Messiah YaHuW’shuwa “is come in the flesh.” Consequently, Origen removed many verses from the original Hebrew Scriptures that gave evidence that YaHuW’shuwa Messiah is YaHuWaH in the flesh. 

Evidence below shows that the Greek Septuagint is a Hoax and it does not pre-date our Messiah. The Greek Septuagint did not come into existence until about 250 A.D.


All modern translations also use the corrupted “Revised Greek Text” for the New Testament. The Revised Greek Text was dramatically altered by two men named “Hort & Westcott” in the 1850’s in England. These men were Jesuit Spies who were working for the Vatican and the New World Order Agenda. They were also followers of Madam Blavatsky’s Luciferian Doctrine. 

But the King James Version uses the Hebrew Masoretic Text for the Old Testament and the “Textus Receptus” aka “Received Text” for the New Testament.

*Disclaimer about the King James Bible

I believe that the King James Bible is a superior translation compared to all other modern translations that I have listed above, and I will illustrate in this article the historical reasons why. However, I do not advocate using the replacement name of LORD in all caps in place of our Creator’s proper name YHWH in the Hebrew Old Testament. I also do not advocate using the name “God” because it is the name of a Babylonian fortune deity as seen in the Hebrew Strong’s Concordance:

Result of search for “baal gawd”:#1171 Ba`al Gad bah’-al gawd from 1168 and 1409; Baal of Fortune; Baal-Gad, a place in Syria:--Baal-gad.

Now having said all of that, I am going to be quoting from the King James Bible and using some of the incorrect vain titles such as “God, LORD, and Jesus Christ” but this is only for the sake of showing a comparison from the King James Bible to the Modern Translations as mentioned above. Aside from the incorrect titles and names that the King James Bible uses, I believe it to be superior to all modern translations and I will soon demonstrate why. In Genesis 49, we read a prophecy about the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) and it goes like this: 

Genesis (Bereshiyth) 49:

YaHuW’dah (Judah), thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise: thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies; thy father’s children shall bow down before thee.

YaHuW’dah (Judah), is a lion’s whelp: from the prey, my son, thou art gone up: he stooped down, he couched as a lion, and as an old lion; who shall rouse him up?

10 The sceptre shall not depart from YaHuW’dah (Judah), nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

As you will see from the research below at this site, King James was a descendant of King David and he held the scepter to give the Torah (Law) to the people of the Covenant (Briyth) or Brit-ain (which means people of the Covenant).


Who Was King James?

Is it true that King James named the Bible after himself? No! The King James Bible published in 1611 was called “The Holy Bible” for the first 300 years until other printers began to call it “The King James Bible” in order to supplant the translation with their false corrupted manuscripts.

Many slanderous things have been written about King James that are simply not true. King James was not a homosexual, and he was not a Freemason. The Jesuits in the Vatican hate King James because he rebelled against the Papacy and he spoke out vehemently against the idolatry of Rome. King James was actually a man of YHWH who fasted and prayed for the purest translation for the people of England. Not only that, but he wrote many papers and letters appealing to the Pope with scriptures proving that he was a heretic and that he needed to repent. King James specifically wrote a paper against the Catholic Mass and Transubstantiation in defiance against the Pope. And so to this day, there is an Illuminati–Jesuit conspiracy to discredit the King James Version of the Bible. 

In the 1500’s Pope Innocent the 3rd founded an order of Catholic Priests under direction of Ignatius Layola of Spain. The purpose of this order of priests was to be trained espionage spies and their goal was to infiltrate the English Parliament. The Pope wanted to bring England back to the Latin Vulgate corrupted manuscript of the Bible, and ultimately bring England back under the rule of the Papacy, but their plan at that time failed. Layola and his Jesuit order were instructed by the Pope to stomp out the Protestant Reformation in the 1500’s, and to bring England back under the ruler-ship of the Pope. But the Protestant Reformation was a “protest” against Rome and her many Babylonian pagan practices. The Protestant Reform-ation was a departure from Mystery Babylon religion, as this was a mighty move of the Holy Spirit in Europe.

Many thousands left the Roman Catholic Institution after the scriptures went into print in the 1500’s starting with Martin Luther who translated the scriptures into German, and for this cause, Jesuits have also written many false things about him. While Martin Luther has been said to have written many things against the Jewish people, I truly believe that the Jesuits have faked many of these documents in order to discredit the Protestant Reformation as a legitimate move of the Holy Spirit. The Protestant Reformation was a legitimate move of the Holy Spirit and a departure from the Roman Papacy. I believe that false propaganda about Martin Luther has been written into history books by the Jesuits to make Martin Luther look like a Jew hater and an anti-Semite. I highly suspect that this has all been fabricated by Rome. The Vatican has been angry about the Protestant Reformation since the 1500’s and so they have sought to malign anyone who was instrumental in calling people out of the Great Whore, Mystery Babylon the Great the Mother of Harlots (the Vatican).

After 1,260 years of being in the Dark Ages (as the Popes would burn people at the stake for reading a Bible), King James commissioned 50 Hebrew (Jewish) Scribes to the Holy Land to recover the Hebrew Masoretic Text and they translated that into English for the people of the Covenant (Brit-ain). Everything negative that has been written about Martin Luther and King James is nothing more than Jesuit-Illuminati propaganda meant to discredit the Protestant Reformation and the King James Version of the Bible. In the beginning of the Reformation, the Protestants started out Torah observant. They preached against Christmas, Easter, and the paganism of Rome. The Puritans who came to America on the Mayflower were also Sabbath Keepers and they observed biblical dietary laws. But not too long after these early settlers came to America, the Vatican sent their Jesuit spies to infiltrate through Freemasonry in our American Government, in Bible Colleges and in our Churches. Today the Protestants are not much different from the Catholic Church, and it is all because the Jesuits/Illuminati have thoroughly infiltrated. See below why the Vatican and the Jesuits hate King James:


Below are some good resources that expose the Illuminati Agenda to gradually change the Scriptures to reflect the doctrine of Satan himself. I highly recommend these sources for discovering what the Vatican Agenda is for totally discrediting King James, the Protestant Reformation, and altering the Scriptures:



More resources below reveal the Conspiracy behind the false rumors about King James being a homosexual:




Vee for Vendetta?

For those of you who may remember that movie that came out a few years back with Natalie Portman entitled “V for Vendetta,” that movie was all about the Vatican (what the letter V really stands for) trying to infiltrate the English Parliament to assassinate King James! Their plan failed and now the Illuminati are at it again, and that is why they made the movie in order to bring England back under the Vatican and the Vicar of Christ the Pope. The letter V stands for Vatican which means “divining serpent” and it also stand for “Vicar” which means “substitute.” Hence the title “Vicar of Christ” in Latin means “Substitute for Christ.”  The word “Anti” in Greek also means “Substitute.”  Hence the term “Antichrist” means the very same thing as “Vicar of Christ” the official title of a Pope! Natalie Portman is from Yisra’el and in this movie they depict her with her head shaved. In scripture, a woman who shaves her head is a temple prostitute as the Apostle Paul explained in 1st Corinthians 11 that it is a “shame for a woman to cut her hair.” The Jewish women in the Nazi war camps during the Holocaust had their heads shaved by the Nazi’s! Can you see what the Illuminati are trying to portray in this movie? The Vatican is getting ready to set up headquarters in Yisra’el and to make Yisra’el the Harlot of Revelation 17. They are going to do this by combining Apostate Christianity, Islam & Rabbinic Judaism into one religion, thereby making Yisra’el the Harlot and by defiling her with Ba’al worship just as in the days when Queen Jezebel and King Ahab defiled Yisra’el.

In 1605 a Roman Catholic by the name of Guy Fawkes, under the direction of a Jesuit priest by the name of Henry Garnet, was found in the basement of the English Parliament with thirty-six barrels of gunpowder which he planning to use to blow up King James and the entire Parliament. After killing the king, they planned on imprisoning his children, re-establishing England as a state loyal to the Pope and to kill all who resisted. Needless to say, the Authorized English Bible (the KJV) would have been one of the plot’s victims. Fawkes and Garnet and eight other conspirators were caught and hanged. It seems that those who work so hard to discredit the character of King James have a hidden agenda. The Vatican truly does have a Vendetta against the Protestant Reformation and the King James Bible!

At this present time in 2012, I am currently working on an Easy Read, Restored Name 1611 King James Version of the Bible. Below is a sample of this version that I am currently working on:

The Set-Apart Word of YaHuWaH יהוה
Easy Read, Restored Name 1611 King James Version

*Commentary by Maria Merola

I have done my best to preserve the integrity of the 1611 King James (Ya’aqob) Version of the scriptures. I have restored the sacred name of our Heavenly Father as YaHuWaH whenever it has been replaced by the word LORD in all capital letters, and next to it, I have included the Paleo Hebrew pictograph יהוה (yad, hey, waw, hey).

I have also restored the title of “God” to the Hebrew ALuWHiYM with the Paleo Pictographs next to it as well אלוהים. I have also restored the name of the patriarchs to include the Heavenly Father’s name of YaHuW in their names wherever they appear. To make sure that I am using the correct Hebrew spelling of these names, I examine the pictograph and use the letters of the Paleo Hebrew with minimal vowel points added for pronunciation. Also, I have restored all of the places in the TaNaK (Law, Prophets & Writings or Old Testament) wherein the Alef & Taw (Hebrew for Alpha & Omega) in pictographs appears in the original Hebrew Text. In the original Paleo Hebrew text the pictograph for  ואת (Waw, Aleph, & Taw) appears many times in the TaNaK (Torah, Nabiym & Katubiym) aka Law, Prophets & Writings. but they are not translated into English and thus it is just ignored and left out of the text. This word is ayth in Hebrew. I have highlighted these places in red because it is a picture of Mashiyach (Messiah). It is defined in the Strong’s Concordance as follows:

#853 ‘eth ayth apparent contracted from 226 in the demonstrative sense of entity; properly, self (but generally used to point out more definitely the object of a verb or preposition, even or namely):--(as such unrepresented in English).

These are important because they are a prophetic symbol of our Messiah YaHuW’ShuWA. What do these letters represent? They are pictographs of the Waw (nail), the Alef (Red Heifer), Taw (Cross or Two Sticks). Hence this is a pictograph of the Red Heifer sacrifice being nailed to the Two Sticks or Two Trees as seen in the prophecy of Ezekiel 37:16-19. The two sticks or two trees represent the Two Houses of Yisa’el Ephrayim and YaHuW’dah.

And so by placing these pictographs of the T-A-W back where they belong, we can gain prophetic insight and meaning pertaining to the pre-incarnate existence of the Son of ALuWHiYM as “the one who was, and is and is to come.”

The awkward archaic language has been updated for certain words such as “sitteth, crieth, lieth, remaineth, lovest” etc. Instead, these words have been changed to “sits, cries, lies, remains, loves” etc. Also, words like “ye, thine, thy, thou, thee, art, wast” are changed to “you, your, yours, are, was.” I did not make very many changes to the way that the sentences are structured because I don’t want to tamper very much with the King James Version. However certain sentence such as “lovest thou me?” Will read like this “do you love me?” rather than “love you me?”  Only a few obsolete words were changed from the King James text. I am using the “Easy Read King James” (not to be confused with the corrupted New King James Version). The Easy Read King James is not a different translation from the 1634 King James Version. It has no copyright law attached to it and the only thing updated are the archaic words:


Genesis-Bereshiyth
Chapter 1

1 In the beginning ALuWHiYM אלוהים created את(Alef & Taw) the heaven and ואת (Waw, Alef & Taw) the earth.

2 And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of ALuWHiYM אלוהים moved upon the face of the waters.

3 And ALuWHiYM אלוהים said, Let there be light: and there was light.

4 And ALuWHiYM אלוהים saw ואת (Waw, Alef & Taw) the light, that it was good: and ALuWHiYM אלוהים divided the light from the darkness.

Chapter 7

1 And YaHuWaH יהוה said unto Noakh, Come you and all your house into the ark; for you have I seen righteous before me in this generation.

2 Of every clean beast you shall take to you by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.

3 Of fowls also of the air by sevens, the male and the female; to keep seed alive upon the face of all the earth.

4 For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living substance that I have made will I destroy from off the face of the earth.

5 And Noakh did according unto all that YaHuWaH יהוה commanded him.

What About the New King James Version?

If you download the chart at the link below, you can see for yourself that the New King James Version is not the same text as the 1611 or 1634 Authorized King James Version. It copies the Jehovah's Witness Watchtower Bible and has many corruptions in it:


Comparing King James Version to the Modern Translations

Here at this website entitled http://www.swordbible.org/ is illustrated by the chart on the next page, the serious alterations made from the original text of the word of our creator.

It is the omission of Sacred Names that has often caused the first doubts over the trustworthiness of the modern translations. Names of Deity are missing, and they are missing frequently! The totals of such omissions in two of the most popular versions (The New American Standard and the New International) are tabulated below. Where these names are in combination, they have been counted separately.

Missing Words:
NASV
NIV
Jesus
73
36
Christ
43
44
Lord
35
35
God
33
31
Total missing names of deity
30
30

The NASV & NIV removes the assertion of our Master’s virgin birth in Matthew 1:25 & Luke 2:7:

KJV: “firstborn son.” 
NASV& NIV: “a son.”

The NASV & NIV questions our Messiah’s DIVINE GOODNESS by deleting the word “good” Matthew 19:16- 17, in both versions they change Messiah’s question from “why do you call me good?” to “why do you ask me about what is good?” When YaHuW’shuwa says “there is none good but one” he goes on to identify that the only one who is good is Elohiym (God), yet the NIV and the NASV leave the word “God” out:

The NIV& NASB: 

16 Now a man came up to Jesus and asked, “Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?” 

17 “Why do you ask me about what is good?” Jesus replied. “There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, obey the commandments.”

KJV: 

16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 

17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

NASV omits the salvation exclusive to faith in Messiah, in John 6:47:

KJV: “He that believeth on Me hath everlasting life.” 
NASV: “He who believes has everlasting life.”

This text in the NASV effectively opens the door of salvation to anyone who believes anything.

NASV: questions Messiah’s Divine SONSHIP in John 6:69:

KJV: “Christ, the Son of the living God. 

NASV: “the Holy One of God.

NASV: eliminates Christ’s title “Son of God” in John 9:35:

KJV: “Son of God” 

NASV: “Son of Man”

The NASV removes the title of “Lord” in 1st Corinthians 15:47 referring to Jesus Christ:

KJV: “…. the second man is the Lord from heaven.”  

NASV: “... the second man is from heaven.”

The NASV dilutes the doctrine of the INSPIRATION of Scripture in the margin of 2nd Timothy 3:16:

KJV: “All scripture is given by inspiration of God.” 

NASV: (in margin) “Every Scripture inspired by God is profitable.”

This NASV marginal note means that not all scripture is inspired by Elohiym. (This implies that only those scriptures “inspired by God” are profitable not ALL scripture.)

The NASV omits reference to our Messiah’s ascension in Luke 24:51:

KJV: “And it came to pass...He was parted from them, and carried up into heaven.” 

NASV: “And it came about...He parted from them.”

The NASV omits “carried up into heaven,” thus removing a reference to our Messiah’s miraculous bodily ascension into heaven.

Here at this website http://www.avpublications.com/ is found various charts revealing the blasphemous changes made to the word of Yah by New Age Bible Translators. You can download and view these charts for yourself here at this link:


DO YOU HAVE A HOLY BIBLE?
NIV, NASB
Citation
KJV
men
2nd Peter 1:21
holy men
angels
Matthew 25:31
holy angels
brethren
1st Thessalonians 5:27
holy brethren
prophets
Revelation 22:6
holy prophets
apostles and prophets
Revelation 18:20
holy apostles and prophets
Spirit
John 7:39
Holy Ghost
Spirit
1st Corinthians 2:13
Holy Ghost
Spirit
Matthew 12:31
Holy Ghost
Spirit
Acts 6:3
Holy Ghost
Spirit
Acts 8:18
Holy Ghost

God of the New
Versions / New Age
Check NASB, NIV, et al.
God of the Bible & Christianity, KJV
the Lord
Exodus 6:3 et al.
JEHOVAH
Christ
2nd Corinthians 5:18
Jesus Christ
the Spirit
Acts 8:18 et al.
the Holy Ghost
divine being
Acts 17:29
The Godhead
OMIT
Revelation 1:11
I am Alpha and Omega
OMIT
John 4:42
Christ
only One
Matthew 19:17et al.
God
The Mighty One
Joshua 22:22
The LORD God
the Lord
1st Corinthians 16:22
Lord Jesus Christ
a son of the gods
Daniel 3:25
the Son of God
Son of Man
John 9:35
Son of God
a God
Acts 14:15 et al.
God
OMIT (Note: The New Versions have entirely removed the most powerful scripture identifying the Godhead!)
1st John 5:7
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
Check NASB, NIV, et al.
KJV
fruit of the light
Ephesians 5:9
fruit of the Spirit
and the nations shall walk by its light
Revelation 21:24
and the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it.
king of nations/ages
Revelation 15:3
King of saints
end of the age
Matthew 28:20
end of the world
I can do everything through him who gives me strength
Philippians 4:13
I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me
He who was revealed in the flesh
1st Timothy 3:16
God was manifest in the flesh
OMIT
Acts 4:24
Thou art God
OMIT
(NASB 73, NIV 38 times)
Matthew 8:29
Jesus
him
Mark 2:15
Jesus
His kingdom
Matthew 6:33
the kingdom of God
He
Revelation 21:4
God
He
Galatians 1:15
God
He
Matthew 22:32
God
his spirit
1st Corinthians 14:2
the spirit
His name
Acts 22:16
the name of the Lord
His name and his Father’s name in their foreheads
Revelation 14:1
(see Rev. 14:11!)
his Father’s name in their foreheads
worship (see Rev. 9, 13, 14, 16)
Philippians 3:3
worship God

God of the New
Versions / New Age
Devil of the Bible & Christianity
Check NASB, NIV, et al.
KJV
morning star
Isaiah 14:12-15
Lucifer
(Image worshippers are) very religious
Acts 17:22
(image worshippers are) too superstitious
visions he has seen
Colossians 2:18
things which he hath not seen
Salvation by Works or Faith in Jesus Christ?
Check NASB, NIV, et al.
KJV
Children, how hard it is to enter the kingdom of God
Mark 10:24
Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God
Salvation by Works or Faith in Jesus Christ? (continued)
By standing firm you will save yourself
Luke 21:19
In your patience possess ye your souls
obey
John 3:36
believeth
faithfulness
Galatians 5:22et al.
faith
OMIT
Romans. 11:6
But if it be of works then is it no more grace
the gospel
Romans 1:16
the gospel of Christ
OMIT
Acts 8:37
I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God
In whom we have redemption
Colossians 1:14
In whom we have redemption through
his blood
who believes
Mark 9:42
believe in me
he who believes has everlasting life
John 6:47
He that believeth on me hath everlasting life
calling on His name
Acts 22:16
calling on the name of the Lord
OMIT
1st John 5:13
and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God
teaching
2nd John 1:9
doctrine of Christ
truth
1st Timothy 2:7
truth in Christ

Salvation by Works or Faith in Jesus Christ? (continued)
Check NASB, NIV, et al.
KJV
Neither is circumcision anything
Galatians 6:15
For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing
I bow my knees before the Father
Ephesians 3:14
I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ
an heir of God
Galatians 4:7
an heir of God through Christ
God who created all things
Ephesians 3:9
God who created all things by Jesus Christ
the Father
Colossians 1:2
our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ
every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God
1st John 4:3
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God.
Below is more damning evidence against the “New International Version.



There are now over 100 different Bible Translations in the English language. Choosing a Bible from this large number raises several questions in the minds of many Yah-fearing followers of Messiah. Are all these Bibles the inspired Word of YHWH? If they are, why are they all different? If all of them are not Yah’s Word, which one is? How can I identify the word of Yah? If we fear YaHuWaH, then it makes good sense to see what he has to say about His Word. The first thing we observe is that Elohiym promised to preserve both His WORD and WORDS:

Yah’s Word endureth for ever” 1st Peter 1:25

My words shall not pass away” Luke 21:33

Thou shalt preserve them” Psalms 12:6-7

(See also Ps. 119:152,160; and Isa. 30:8; 59:21)

Did Elohiym keep His promises? We should, like Abraham when Elohiym promised that Sarah would have a son, ignore natural concerns and believe that Yah is able to perform His promises (Romans 4:19-21). Believing Yah’s promises by faith, we can be fully persuaded, with evidence, that Yah has surely preserved His Word and words (Hebrews 11:1).

YaHuW’shuwa believed the promises of Yah. He said, “Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law” (Matthew 5:18). And He further taught the scriptures were word perfect when He said, The scripture cannot be broken” (John 10:35).

Elohiym further promised His preserved words would have certain characteristics. These Yah-given features were to provide the criteria by which all Bibles could be judged.

“Every word of Elohiym is pure” Proverbs 30:5.

They are not froward or perverse” Proverbs 8:8.

No lie is of the truth” 1st John 2:21.

(See also Ps. 19:7-9; Luke 4:4; 16:17; John 10:35).

When tried by these criteria, modern Bibles condemn themselves. Thank YaHuWaH for giving us wisdom and light to determine His infallible words from the words of men.

Since YaHuWaH Elohiym said that his preserved words are pure, with nothing froward or perverse in them, and cannot be broken; it is our duty to judge each Bible by these standards. Now we must answer a question raised earlier, “Why do these versions make such obvious errors?” Scripture answers it this way: “He taketh the wise in their own craftiness” (Job 5:12-14). Our Elohiym is supremely jealous for His Word, which He has magnified above His name (Psalms 138:2), and will confound man’s efforts to corrupt it. “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise.... Where is the wise? where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this world? Hath not Elohiym made foolish the wisdom of this world?”

This review shows clearly the flagrant changes made to the words of Elohiym by modern “scribes” and “disputers.” Historical events are denied, cross-references are destroyed, doctrine is perverted, and Yah’s promises of preservation are rejected. As a result, in spite of 100 different Bibles being available today, many do not have the words of Elohiym. Peter considered his scriptures more sure than the voice of Yah from heaven (2nd Peter 1:16-21). We have this more sure Word in the English language in the Yah-approved, fruit-bearing, and enduring King James Version.

Upon seeing these charts above, it is no wonder that YaHuWshuwa Messiah said in Mark 4:15, in the parable of the sower that “Satan cometh immediately and taketh away the word.”

Bible Versions that Undermine the Deity of Messiah: An Easy Litmus Test

When examining a Bible, the first verse that I look at is Daniel 3:25, and I can tell right off the bat if the translator used the Greek Septuagint or the Hebrew Masoretic Text. As you can see from the comparisons below, the King James Version and the Old Jewish Bible both use the correct wording from the Hebrew Masoretic Text (Bar Elah) or “Son of Elohiym” (God) which clearly reveals that it was the pre-incarnate Messiah who was in the furnace as this fourth person with the three Hebrews:

Daniel 3:25 (King James Version)


He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God.


Daniel 3:25 (Old Jewish Bible)


He answered and said, Lo, I see anashim arba’ah (four men) free (not bound, loose), walking in the midst of the eish (fire), and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Bar Elohin (Ben Elohim, Hebrew).


Now let’s examine the translations that use the Greek Septuagint below. All of these versions imply that the 4th person in the furnace with the three Hebrews was “one of the gods” or “a son of the gods” and it has removed any implication that this was the “Son of Elohiym” (God) or the pre-incarnate Messiah!


Daniel 3:25 (Complete Jewish Bible)


But he exclaimed, “Look! I see four men, not tied up, walking around there in the flames, unhurt; and the fourth lookslike one of the gods!”


Daniel 3:25 (NIV)


He said, “Look! I see four men walking around in the fire, unbound and unharmed, and the fourth looks like a son of the gods.”


Daniel 3:25 New American Standard Bible (NASB)


He said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire [a]without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like a son of the gods!”


Son of the Morning or Morning Star?


In Isaiah 14:12, in the original Hebrew text it does not say that the one who fell from heaven was “the morning star.” That title is reserved for our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa alone!


Revelation 22:16 I YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the bright and morning star.


Satan wants to be the bright and morning star! He wants to be the “sun of righteousness”:


Malachi 4:2 But unto you that fear my name shall the Sun of righteousness arise with healing in his wings; and ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall.


It is for this reason that he has masqueraded himself as “the pagan sun-god” of many pagan religions! Satan has tricked people into worshiping the created object of “the sun” rather than the creator (YaHuW’shuwa Messiah) who created all things according to Colossians 1:16 & Ephesians 3:9. We are commanded not to worship the “creature” but rather the Creator (Romans 1:25). The King James Version and the Old Jewish Bible clearly show what the original Hebrew text says in Isaiah 14:12:


Isaiah 14:12 (King James Version)


How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! 


Isaiah 14:12 (Old Jewish Bible)


How art thou fallen from Shomayim, O Heilel Ben Shachar (Bright One of the Dawn, Day Star, Lucifer)! How art thou cast down to the earth, thou, which hast laid low the Goyim!


The Strong’s Concordance translates the word Lucifer as “Heylel” which means “shining one.” The word “morning” in Hebrew is “Shachar.”


#1966 Heylel (Lucifer) = “light-bearer” shining one, Lucifer; of the king of Babylon and Satan (fig.); ‘Helel’ describing the king of Babylon.


#7837 shachar shakh’-ar from 7836; dawn (literal, figurative or adverbial):--day(-spring), early, light, morning, whence riseth.


The Hebrew text calls him “the son of the morning” which in Hebrew is “Heyel Ben Shachar.”


But the Greek Septuagint translates this as if it says in Hebrew: “Boker Kokab” (morning star) rather than “son of the morning.”


What is the difference? The Morning Star is the Messiah who created all things. He represents the brightest star in our solar system (the sun). Satan of course wants to mimic him by portraying himself as the “brightest star” in the solar system. But the “son” of the morning is a term that means that Lucifer (Satan) was merely a created being and that he was created by the Messiah who is the “bright and morning star.” Gnosticism uses this verse in Isaiah 14:12 in order to assimilate our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus Christ) to Lucifer by purporting that they are one and the same being!


Isaiah 14:12 (NIV)


How you have fallen from heaven, morning star, son of the dawn! You have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!


Isaiah 14:12 New American Standard Bible (NASB)


“How you have fallen from heaven, O star of the morning, son of the dawn! You have been cut down to the earth, You who have weakened the nations!


Now let’s examine Exodus 6 in three different versions below. While we know that the name JEHOVAH is not the correct way to say the name of our Creator (since there was no letter V or J in Ancient Hebrew), we know that it is pronounced as YAHUWAH. But at least the King James Translators made an attempt at following the Hebrew Masoretic Text by using the proper name, but the NIV & NASB removed the proper name and implies that his proper name is “LORD.”


Exodus 6: (King James Version)


1 Then the LORD said unto Moses, Now shalt thou see what I will do to Pharaoh: for with
a strong hand shall he let them go, and with a strong hand shall he drive them out of his land.


2 And God spake unto Moses, and said unto him, I am the LORD:


3 And I appeared unto Abraham, unto Isaac, and unto Jacob, by the name of God Almighty,
but by my name JEHOVAH was I not known to them.


Exodus 6: (Complete Jewish Bible)


1 ADONAI said to Moshe, “Now you will see what I am going to do to Pharaoh. With a mighty hand he will send them off; with force he will drive them from the land!” 


2 God spoke to Moshe; he said to him, “I am ADONAI. 


3 I appeared to Avraham, Yitz’chak and Ya’akov as El Shaddai, although I did not make myself known to them by my name, Yud-Heh-Vav-Heh [ADONAI].” 


Exodus 6: (NIV & NASB)


1 Then the LORD said to Moses, “Now you will see what I will do to Pharaoh: Because of my mighty hand he will let them go; because of my mighty hand he will drive them out of his country.”


2 God also said to Moses, “I am the LORD. 


3 I appeared to Abraham, to Isaac and to Jacob as God Almighty, but by my name the LORD I did not make myself fully known to them.


Now let’s make a comparison with all modern translations of 1st John 4:3 to the King James Version below. You will notice that the “Textus Receptus” (the text that the KJV uses for the New Testament) says that the criteria for identifying the Spirit of Anti-Messiah is one who denies that our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa “is come in the flesh.” In other words he was not merely a reincarnation of all the other pagan deities as the Gnostics preach. Gnosticism purports that he did not physically die on the cross and he did not resurrect. They claim that he came not in a human mortal body but as a “Spirit” that overshadowed many other “ascended masters” in the past such as Apollo, Krishna, Buddha, Bacchus, Nimrod, Tammuz, Zeus, Hercules, Horus, etc. And so Origen of Alexandria deliberately removed this verse from the Antiochian text of the New Testament in the 2nd Century, and he changed the verse to read “every spirit who does not acknowledge Jesus.” Well this is NOT very much of a criterion! Even the devil acknowledges the existence of the Messiah! (James 2:19). Now when making a comparison, we can easily see which versions use the text that Origen tampered with and which versions use the Textus Receptus:


1st John 4:3 (King James Version)


And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.


1st John 4:3 (The Scriptures Version 1998)


And every spirit that does not confess that יהושע Messiah has come in the flesh is not of Elohim. And this is the spirit of the anti-messiah which you heard is coming, and now is already in the world.


*Note: There is a difference between the past tense “has come in the flesh” (which is how the Scriptures Version renders this verse) and the present tense “is come in the flesh” in the King James Version. Our Messiah has come in the flesh in the past, but he will also return in the flesh in the future with a resurrected body! This is very important!


1st John 4:3 (Complete Jewish Bible)


And every spirit which does not acknowledge Yeshua is not from God - in fact, this is the spirit of the Anti-Messiah.


1st John 4:3 (NIV)


But every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming and even now is already in the world.


1st John 4:3 New American Standard Bible (NASB)


And every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God; this is the spirit of the antichrist, of which you have heard that it is coming, and now it is already in the world.


1st John 5:7: Interpolation or Removed by the Gnostic Origen?


Now one more comparison that I would like to make that I believe will help you in your search for a complete Bible. I have a tremendous amount of respect for Andrew Gabriel Roth and I highly recommend the AENT (Aramaic English New Testament) that he meticulously worked on. I own a copy and I find it absolutely invaluable to my studies and research. The study notes that he includes and the footnotes are a treasure of knowledge and wisdom. But I strongly disagree with him about the fact that 1st John 5:7 was “added into the text” by the King James translators. It is a well-documented fact that Origen of Alexandria removed 1st John 5:7 from the Greek Textus Receptus from Antioch because he did not believe in the deity of our Messiah! Andrew Roth and others who believe this verse was “added” seem to think that this verse supports the erroneous belief of Trinitarianism (the belief that our Creator is three separate persons). However, a closer examination of this verse, reveals that it actually supports just the opposite! 1st John 5:7 supports the “Oneness Doctrine” of YaHuWaH Elohiym! When it states that “these three are one” it is not stating that they are “three separate persons.” But rather, YaHuWaH Elohiym is only “one person” (Hebrews 1:3) and he has three manifestations as “Father, Son & Holy Spirit.” It is no different than me saying that “I, Maria Merola am only one person, yet I am a mother, a daughter and a sister” all at the same time!


Why is this verse so important? Because the removal of this verse has led to three erroneous doctrines:


1.)  YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) is a “lesser god” than the Heavenly Father.


2.)  YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) is not deity or Elohiym (God) in the flesh at all     (Jehovah’s Witnesses teach this).


3.)  YaHuW’shuwa (Jesus) is one of “many gods” (Mormons teach this).


All three of the above doctrines are false!


1st John 5:7 has been removed from all modern translations such as NIV, NASB, Complete Jewish Bible. Even “The Scriptures Version 1998” has removed this verse! It becomes apparent that 1st John 5:7 was removed when you read the entire chapter in context. Let’s examine how the other verses go together in the King James Version:


1st John 5:8


5 Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?


6 This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.


7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.


8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.


9 If we receive the witness of men, the witness of God is greater: for this is the witness of God which he hath testified of his Son.


What we see here is that the “witness of Elohiym” (God) is greater than the witness of men. The three witnesses who testify in heaven are:


1.)  The Heavenly Father

2.)  The Word who became flesh (the Messiah)

3.)  The Holy Spirit (the Spirit of YaHuWaH)


This verse is not implying that these three witnesses are three separate persons. In fact, it is saying just the opposite! It is telling us that YaHuWaH Elohiym has manifested himself in three ways to correspond to the “three witnesses” here on earth:


1.)  The Holy Spirit

2.)  The Living Water (symbolic of the word)

3.)  The Blood of Messiah (the Father’s blood was in the Son).


Hence the three earthly witnesses testify of the three heavenly witnesses! The Holy Spirit is the Spirit of YaHuWaH seen in “seven attributes” or “seven spirits of YHWH” (Revelation 1:4, 3:1, 4:5, 5:6, Isaiah 11:2-3).


The Water is the “Living Water” who is Messiah himself! He called himself “the living water” in John 4:10-11. The Apostle Sha’ul (Paul) also said that the Messiah “sanctifies his bride” by “the washing of water by the word” (Ephesians 5:26). Since he is also that WORD who became flesh (John 1:1), then it stands to reason that he is also “the water” that cleanses us from the filthiness of the world. We can see this in the shadow picture of the “bronze laver” in the Tabernacle of Moses (Exodus 30:18). The Levites examined themselves in the reflection of the water (like a mirror) and the word of Elohiym is also likened unto a “mirror” where we allow the word to examine us as we compare ourselves to the “perfect law of liberty”(James 1:25).


And then finally, we know that the Messiah’s blood was perfect and sinless, otherwise he could not have been the perfect blood atonement for sins!


Zechariah 12:10 reveals to us that the Father himself and the Son were both pierced on the cross:


And I will pour upon the house of Dawiyd (David), and upon the inhabitants of Yerushalayim (Jerusalem), the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon את(Alef & Taw) ME whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for HIM, as one mourns for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn.


You will notice that the ME & HIM are the same person who was pierced!


You will notice that the end-time prophecy about the House of YaHuW’dah (Judah) in the last days shows that Alef & Taw (the first and the last) is present. It is YHWH himself who was pierced and it says that the House of YaHuW’dah will look upon ME (the Alef & Taw) and they will mourn for HIM. YaHuWaH himself was pierced for us!


YaHuW’shuwa is YaHuWaH Elohiym manifested in the flesh!!!


The illustration above shows that YaHuWaH is the same “Alef & Taw” (the Alpha & Omega) seen in Revelation 1:8, 1:11, 21:6, 22:13. This is a symbol for the “Red Heifer, nailed to the Two Sticks!”


It shows that YaHuWaH (the Father) is the Alef & Taw and he manifests himself as “the Son” who was pierced for us when he came to earth and became flesh!


Now in support of Andrew Gabriel Roth’s AENT, I must say that I really love it that he brings out the fact that 1st Corinthians 12 in the Aramaic Peshitta proves that our Messiah YaHuW’shuwa is YaHuWaH come in the flesh.


The Aramaic Peshitta Reveals YaHuW’shuwa as YaHuWaH


1st Corinthians 12:3 (KJV) Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit of Elohim calls Jesus accursed: and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.


1st Corinthians 12:3 (Aramic Peshitta) Therefore I make known to you that no one speaking by the Spirit of Elohiym says YaHuW’shuwa is a curse, and no one is able to say that YaHuW’shuwa is Master YHWH except by the Ruach ha'Kodesh (Holy Spirit).


One problem that we have with the Greek text, which most of us get our English translations from is that the word “kurios” for “Lord” does not give us the distinction of the word LORD in all capital letters as YaHuWaH or if it is the word Lord in upper and lower case as “master” or Adonai.


#2962. kurios koo’-ree-os from kuros (supremacy); supreme in authority, i.e. (as noun) controller; by implication, Master (as a respectful title):-- God, Lord, master, Sir.


In the Aramaic Peshitta it is easy to know when YHWH is intended because it is MarYah which means “Master Yah” or shortened for Master YHWH.


YaHuW’shuwa is YaHuWaH revealed in the Flesh!


Here are some verses which plainly teach that YaHuW’shuwa is YaHuWaH, as found in the Aramaic Peshitta:


Actually there is plenty of proof that YaHuW’shuwa is called YAHuWaH (MarYah) in Aramaic.


Thomas saying in John’s Gospel, “Mari wElahi”, or My Master and my El (My Lord and my God).


Luke 2:11 Because there was born to you today in the city of David a Saviour, who is Messiah, MarYah (Master YHWH).


Acts 2:36 Therefore let all the house of Yisrael know for certain that Elohiym has made this YaHuW’shuwa, whom you impaled, both MarYah (Master YHWH) and Messiah.


Bibles that I recommend


There are other Hebraic Roots Versions that I want to recommend even though I am still partial to the King James Version. 


The most important thing to look for in a Bible is to first make sure that the translation comes from Masoretic Hebrew Text for the “Old Testament” writings (TaNaKh). One way to tell is by looking at the verses that I mentioned above (Daniel 3:25 & Isaiah 14:12). Secondly look to see if the New Testament portion is translated from either the Aramaic Peshitta and/or the Textus Receptus.


If the translation you are looking to purchase uses the Greek Septuagint for the Old Testament and the Revised Greek Text for the New Testament, then it is taken from a corrupted text. Is the King James Version the only version that uses the right text? There are other Hebraic Root’s translations of the Bible that I recommend that use the Hebrew Old Testament rather than the corrupted Greek Septuagint. What are these translations? 

1.) I like the AENT “Aramaic English New Testament” by Andrew Gabriel Roth for proving the deity of our Messiah, by leaving intact the proper name of YaHuWaH in the New Testament scriptures instead of the generic and ambiguous title “Lord” (kurios in Greek). The AENTalso leaves 1st John 4:3 intact as does the KJV. I also like the AENT for the way that Andrew Roth he clears up much of the confusion surrounding the Apostle Sha’ul (Paul’s) letters and the many historical references that he provides. http://www.aent.org/


2.) I also like “The Besorah of YaHuWsha” because it also matches the Hebrew Masoretic Text in scriptures like Daniel 3:25 & Isaiah 14:12. It also keeps 1st John 4:3 intact like the KJV does, although it also removes 1st John 5:7.  


3.) I also like the “HalleluYah Scriptures” which also uses the Hebrew Masoretic Text for scriptures like Daniel 3:25 & Isaiah 14:12, and it matches the Textus Receptus in scriptures like 1st John 4:3. Although the HalleluYah Scriptures also removes 1st John 5:7 as well. http://www.halleluyahscriptures.com


4.) I also would like to recommend “The Hebraic Roots Version Revised Edition” by James Trimm. This version is also excellent for historic references and additional educational footnotes. James Trimm also uses the Hebrew Masoretic Text and matches Daniel 3:25 & Isaiah 14:12 as does the KJV. The Hebraic Roots Version also leaves 1st John 4:3 intact as does the KJV but it also removes 1st John 5:7 http://nazarenespace.com/profiles/blogs/hebraic-roots-version-ebook


5.) The Scriptures Version 1998 also matches the Hebrew Masoretic Text in verses like Daniel 3:25 & Isaiah 14:12. It also leaves 1st John 4:3 intact like the King James Version, but it also removes 1st John 5:7. http://eliyah.com/thescriptures/

Free download of E-Sword: http://www.e-sword.net/

27 comments:

  1. Hi there,I found your notes very helpful and informative, I did notice that you have a slight mistake in your notes, see the following passage, 'The KJV uses the plural noun prophets to allow Mark 1:2 to be quoted from Mal. 1:3 and Mark 1:3 to be quoted from Isa. 40:3.'
    Regards,
    Derek

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello Derek that mistake came from this website:

    http://www.baptistpillar.com/bd0298.htm

    I will re-read it all and see if I can make any corrections to it. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Maria, have you had a chance to review the HalleluYah Scriptures?

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Natsarim, Yes I do have the HalleluYah Scriptures!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hi Maria,

    I just have a few things. One, Martin Luther always wanted to be a Catholic. He just wanted to change them thus the 95 Thesis writings. Yet he was a Catholic through and through. I call him the accidental Reformer.

    Secondly In his writings from Luther’s Works Volume 47 he does come across as anti-Semitic. What would cause this I am not sure but he was older when he wrote it.

    You are making the same mistake KJV Onlyists do by setting the KJV as the standard for the English language when most of the Pilgrims who came across on the Mayflower used the Geneva Bible. There was also the Bishops Bible and 3 other English bibles that pre date the KJV.

    Then again which version of the KJV are we discussing because the original KJV is nothing like the one we have currently.

    Just trying to get t the bottom of this debate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To wit, the MYTH that the Puritans continued to use the Geneva Bible after the KJB was produced and in fact had to be almost coerced into using the KJB.
      This is PURE MYTH.
      In fact, it was the PURITANS who REQUESTED the translation of the KJB to begin with. Without the Puritans REQUESTING the KJB, there would never have BEEN a KJB.
      Moreover, a great many of the KJB translators were themselves PURITANS, and contrary to our modern day myth-makers from established religious and orthodox seminaries, the Puritans adopted the KJB with virtual IMMEDIACY.
      All one must do to confirm this is READ the quotations of such men as John Bunyan (who stated that he believed the Authorised Version to be the EXACT REPLICA of the autographs), John Owen, Richard Baxter, Thomas Boston, Thomas Brooks, Stephen Charnock, Thomas Goodwin, George Swinnock, and MANY others, and it will be discovered that these men ALL lived within a generation of the publication of the KJB, and that these men ALL used the KJB, NOT the Geneva Bible.

      Delete
    2. “As you can see, it appears everyone is adamant that the Bible of the early Pilgrims was the Geneva Bible and “certainly not the King's of England's Bible!”. Perhaps the record should be set straight as to whose Bible this was. It was certainly not the King of England's Bible. For far too long this rhetoric has been spouted. King James had nothing to do with the translation of this Bible nor did he even come up with the idea to produce a new translation. Here are the historical facts of the matter as laid down by Samuel Bagster in the wonderful book, “An Historical Account of the English Versions of the Scriptures” (published - 1841).
      Soon after James I ascended the throne on March 24, 1603 a petition in the name of more than 1,000 ministers was brought before the King. The petition, called the “Millenary Petition”, was separated into 4 headings; 1) Things connected with the Church service; 2) Church ministers; 3) Church living and maintenance; and 4) Church discipline. Promptly, a letter was written in answer of these matters and sent to the King by the University of Oxford. Because of this James I decided to bring the matter to a public conference. Delegates representing the Anglicans and those of the petitioners were invited to the palace of Hampton Court the following January. The delegates representing the 1,000 ministers were Dr. John Reynolds, Dr. Thomas Sparke of Oxford, Mr. Chadderton and Mr. Knewstubbs from Cambridge. At the conference Dr. Reynolds took on the role as chief speaker and brought before the King a request “for a New Translation of the Bible” on the second day.
      Prior to this day there is no historical record that the King had entertained such a notion as a new Bible translation. Dr. Reynolds' suggestion (which was really the suggestion of the 1,000 petitioners) found favor in the King's eyes and James I heard Reynolds and the others concerning the matter. During the conference, the Anglican delegates, led by Archbishop Bancroft, opposed the idea of a new translation. Despite Bancroft's efforts King James I gave permission to Dr. Reynolds and the delegates with him to proceed with the process of rendering a new translation of the Bible into the English language. “The method proposed by the king was this; that the version should be made by some of the most learned men in both the Universities, that it should then be reviewed by the bishops and other of the most learned ecclesiastics, that it should then be laid before the Privy Council, and last of all be ratified by Royal authority, so that in the whole Anglican establishment this translation so made should be used, and no other (Bagster, “An Historical Account of the English Versions of the Scriptures”, p. 149).”
      For long King James I has been blamed for the removal of the notes found in the Geneva Bible. This is not an entirely true statement and the facts have been misrepresented as have most `facts' that are reported by the other side. While the King didn't necessarily agree with some of the notes there is absolutely no indication that he planned to force the translators to remove them. If anyone can produce information to the contrary I would be delighted to have it. Interestingly enough, the idea to have the notes removed entirely came from Archbishop Bancroft and not Dr. Reynolds, King James I or any of the petitioners. So, the next time you hear or read the lie that King James I wanted a new Bible because he didn't like the notes or that he was responsible for their removal you can present the facts. As I stated earlier, James I didn't like some of the notes but it wasn't until after Bancroft suggested that they be withheld from the new translation that James I commented on them.” (taken from Pilgrims and the Geneva Bible by Martin A. Shue)

      Delete
  7. @Truths in the Word: I am not advocating a King James Only mindset. I am only setting the record straight about King James and the propaganda that has been maliciously spread about him. I like the Geneva Bible also. The main thing is that we should not be using the corrupted Greek Septuagint for the Old Testament because this was altered by the Gnostics in the 2nd Century. Also, we should not use the Revised Greek text by Hort & Westcott which is used by all modern translations. It does not have to be a King James Version, so long as the Hebrew Old Testament is used rather than the Greek Septuagint. Some Bibles that use the Hebrew Masoretic Text are the HalleluYah Scriptures and also the 1998 ISR Scriptures Version. I am only making a comparison to the modern corrupt translations.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @Truths in the Word: What I want to say about Martin Luther is that history books have been altered by the Jesuits to discredit him. I don't believe he wanted to be a Catholic at all. While I do believe that he was upset because the Jews of his time rejected the Gospel, his writings have been tampered with by the Jesuits in order to make him look like a Jew-hater. I believe that Martin Luther was probably no more upset with the non-believing Jews of his day than Messiah was with the Scribes and Pharisees of his time. I believe that his writings have been tampered with and exaggerated by the Vatican in order to discredit the Protestant Reformation as a legitimate move of the Holy Spirit.

    ReplyDelete
  9. woah so I just emailed the halleluyahscriptures people and watched some of that. That seems incredible and I cannot believe that all these modern translations have form of paganism in it. I cannot believe it. I know there are over 100 translations and ebcause of that I got many so can understand more. When is the easily read and restored KJV going to come out because man I just want accuracy. I love this. Are all of these not Hebrew manuscripts though because these are important ones (i have over 30 but these are ones into the most): Complete Jewish Bible, Ancient Roots Translinear Bible, Aramaic New Testament translated by Victor Alexander (http://www.v-a.com/bible/index.html), Wuest New Testament expanded Trans. (use as an add on to other translation Im reading), NASB, NIV, Moffatt, NET. I truly am willing to get rid of all that may be hindering me or not most accurate. :). Thanks for the help. I was very excited emailing the halleluyah scripture people. Hope to receive that soon. Thanks for all the stuff you put out. I'm seeing things I've never seen before. I just read your article on Grace Establishes the Law. Man I need this kind of teaching all around me. Too bad you didn't live in Kansas City. Blessings :)

    ReplyDelete
  10. the ARTB says the hebrew text was used but also other texts (http://www.ancientrootsbible.com/more-verse-for-the-day-mainmenu-84/13-blog-category/55-manuscripts-for-artb.html). hmm. Seems CJV is a greek manuscript unfortunatels :(. In aramaic bible the translator says "The translation that you will find on this website is made from the original Ancient Aramaic Scriptures directly into English, bypassing the errors of the Greek Original, the Latin Vulgate and all the Western translations made from them. This is an attempt to rekindle the faith in Eashoa Msheekhah (Jesus the Messiah) according to His teachings." Check it out http://www.v-a.com/bible/. I just want what's correct. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks Chris! I don't know when I will have the Easy Read Restored Name Alef & Taw Bible ready. It may take me years. But what I am doing to do is post each book up for download online as it gets finished. For instance, once I am done putting all of the Alef & Taws back into the book of Genesis, I will post it in PDF file and people can download it. As each book is finished, I will offer it as a PDF and people can print it out.

    ReplyDelete
  12. That'll be great. Thanks!! Looks like I shouldnt be reading all these translations anymore, the CJB was interesting me. Hope I get that hallelujah bible. Anyways thanks for posting this stuff. It's pretty helpful

    ReplyDelete
  13. 1- How do you know how to pronounce the name, and know it is not Jehovah or Yahweh? I am not saying you are wrong, but I've never seen anyone speak with such authority as to ~knowing~ how to pronounce this name.

    Regardless, it is most important for us to all think about this name:

    (Malachi 3:16) . . .At that time those in fear of Jehovah spoke with one another, each one with his companion, and Jehovah kept paying attention and listening. And a book of remembrance began to be written up before him for those in fear of Jehovah and for those thinking upon his name.


    2-
    What makes you believe Jesus returns in the flesh, to the earth a second time? My understanding is Christ came in the flesh, once for all time. When he was here the first time, his perfect blood was shed once, and there is no need for him to manifest in the flesh again.

    (Hebrews 10:10) . . .By the said “will” we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all time.

    When the Christ is seen "again" it is not himself, his own flesh (as he is in heaven), it is his witnesses whom are seen, as these make the "body" of Christ, and these are "called" and "chosen" by Jehovah himself, as they follow the Lamb (Jesus) everywhere he goes.

    (Colossians 1:24) I am now rejoicing in my sufferings for YOU, and I, in my turn, am filling up what is lacking of the tribulations of the Christ in my flesh on behalf of his body, which is the congregation.

    Jesus said:
    (John 7:33-34) . . .Therefore Jesus said: “I continue a little while longer with YOU before I go to him that sent me. 34 YOU will look for me, but YOU will not find me, and where I am YOU cannot come.”

    and Jesus said:
    (John 16:16) 16 In a little while YOU will behold me no longer, and, again, in a little while YOU will see me.”

    In John 16:16 Jesus says "... in a little while YOU will see me." YOU is in capital letters, it is spoken to a particular group of people who will read this with understanding. The verses which follow this describe the "woman" giving birth, Christ's bride described in the following verses of John whom Jesus describes as ones who "glorified" him as the Christ and given to him by Jehovah and "sanctified."

    (John 17:6-10) . . .I have made your name manifest to the men you gave me out of the world. They were yours, and you gave them to me, and they have observed your word. 7 They have now come to know that all the things you gave me are from you; 8 because the sayings that you gave me I have given to them, and they have received them and have certainly come to know that I came out as your representative, and they have believed that you sent me forth. 9 I make request concerning them; I make request, not concerning the world, but concerning those you have given me; because they are yours, 10 and all my things are yours and yours are mine, and I have been glorified among them.

    (John 17:15-19) . . .“I request you, not to take them out of the world, but to watch over them because of the wicked one. 16 They are no part of the world, just as I am no part of the world. 17 Sanctify them by means of the truth; your word is truth. 18 Just as you sent me forth into the world, I also sent them forth into the world. 19 And I am sanctifying myself in their behalf, that they also may be sanctified by means of truth.


    Please know, the KJV is not perfect either.
    - (Exodus 20:13) . . .You must not murder.
    KJV says "kill"

    - (Revelation 13:16) . . .And it puts under compulsion all persons, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free and the slaves, that they should give these a mark in their right hand or upon their forehead,
    KJV says "take" mark

    - KJV inserts "Easter" when it should read, "Passover"

    There's more, but these are big ones.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. According to the critics, the word "Easter" in Acts 12:4 is a mistranslation, because the Greek word is"pascha," and it is translated "passover" twenty-eight times in the New Testament, and it should be translated likewise in Acts 12:4.

      This is what happens when a man is so hung up on "the Greek" that he can't read plain English. It should NOT be translated "passover" because the Passover had already passed. The "days of unleavened bread" had already begun (vs. 3), which means the Passover was over (Num. 28:16-18; Exo. 12:13-18). The Passover was always the fourteenth day of the first month, while the days of unleavened bread ran from the fifteenth through the twenty-first. Herod could not have been waiting for the Passover. Besides, why would a Gentile king like Herod be concerned about a Jewish feast day? "Easter" is from the pagan "Ishtar", the goddess that the pagans worshipped--Rome included. Herod wanted to wait until his pagan holiday was over before bringing Peter out to the people.

      Errors in the King James Bible http://www.av1611.org/kjv/fight.html#fight8

      Delete
    2. Regarding Exodus 20:13, not only does the King James Bible read "Thou shalt not kill" but so also do Tyndale 1534 (he translated Exodus before his death), Coverdale 1535, The Great Bible 1540, Matthew's Bible 1549, Bishops' Bible 1568, the Geneva Bible 1599, Webster's translation 1833, the Brenton Bible 1851, Lesser Bible 1853, the 1936 Hebrew Publishing Company version, the Catholic Douay 1950, the Douay-Rheims of 1610, Darby 1890, the American Standard Version 1901, the Revised Standard Version 1952, Lamsa's 1933 translation of the Syriac Peshitta, the St. Joseph New American Bible 1970, the New Life Bible 1969, the Updated Bible Version 2003, the KJV 21st Century Version 1994, Green's Modern KJV 1998, the Third Millenium Bible 1998, the Context Group Version 2007, the Heritage Bible 2003 and the brand new critical text Common English Bible of 2011 - "Do not kill."

      Among foreign language Bibles that also say "Thou shalt not KILL" are , the Spanish Reina Valera 1909, 1960, 1995, La Biblia de las Américas 1997 - "no matarás", the French Martin 1744, Louis Segond 1910 and the French Ostervald 1996 - "Tu ne tueras point.", the Italian Diodati 1649, the New Diodati 1991 and the 2006 Nuova Riveduta - "Non uccidere.", Luther's German Bible 1545 - "Du sollst nicht töten." and the Portuguese Almeida Actualizada (Modern Almeida), A Biblia Sagrada em Portugués and the 2000 O Livro - "Não matarás."

      Delete
    3. If the KJV is incorrect in its translation of "raw-tsakh" as "kill" and the NIV has corrected it as "murder" in Exodus 20:13, then we would expect this same Hebrew word that the KJV "mistranslates" to be "corrected" in Deuteronomy 4:42 as well. However, the NIV reads in this passage, "to which anyone who had killed a person could flee if he had unintentionally killed his neighbor without malice aforethought. He could flee into one of these cities and save his life." So do the NKJV, RSV, ESV.

      If translating "raw-tsakh" in the future tense as "kill" is wrong in Exodus 20:13, then it is also wrong in Deuteronomy 4:42, but there modern versions translate it as "kill." Why? Because the word can be translated either way; either one is therefore a correct translation.

      Delete
  14. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello Buckaroo, I don't have time to answer everything at the moment. I will read this all in detail later and answer everything you posted. First of all the word Easter in Acts 12 is there for a good reason. It is because King Herod was a pagan who celebrated pagan holidays. He captured Peter (Kefa) and then after that were the days of Unleavened Bread which is 7 days long according to Leviticus 23. Then he was waiting until his pagan Easter holiday to kill Peter. You see Passover had already come and gone by the time Herod captured Peter. The next day after Passover is the Feast of Unleavened Bread. And so if the word there should have been Passover, then the days of Unleavened Bread would not have occurred yet! When you look up the word Easter in Greek Strong's Concordance it is "Pascha" because to this day, that is how the Greeks and Italians say Easter! So that means that the pagans have assimilated the word Pascha (Passover) as Easter and they are now treating it as the same thing even though it is not! But you see, every other place where the word Passover was intended,the King James Translators used the correct word for Passover! Why? Because they figured out that Herod was a pagan who wanted to kill Peter on his human sacrifice day of Easter!

      Now, getting back to the question about the name. It is through a process of elimination that we can easily figure out the Father's name. First of all if you do some research, you will find out that the letter J & V did not exist in the Ancient Hebrew language. The letter J was invented in the 1500's so it is only about 500 years old. The letter V comes from the Greek Upsilon which is equivalent to the Hebrew "Waw" (or modern Vav) without the tail on the bottom. The Hebrew "Waw" doubles as a consonant and makes the "W" sound and it also makes the "long u" vowel sound. That is why the "double u" is used to make the correct sounds in the Father's name.

      Then we must also realize that the original Hebrew language had no vowels in it. The Masorites added vowels to the Hebrew Scriptures in the 7th Century. Go and look up Strong's Hebrew Concordance #3068 for the word "LORD" and you will see that it is listed as "Yehovah." But since the Masorites (Hebrew Scribes) added vowels into the Hebrew Scriptures, the name of the Father was only 4 letters: YHWH (there was no letter V). The letter V came from Germany and the Jewish people in Germany allowed the Germans to supplant the Hebrew letter "Waw" and turn it into a "Vav."

      In Ancient Hebrew, since there were no vowels, the 22 letters each doubled as vowels as well as consonants. And so if you read these four letters without vowels and you know that these letters also double as consonants and vowels, then the Yod = Y sound; the Hey = ah sound, the Waw = oo sound or long u; and the Hey = ah sound again.

      Hence the pronunciation: YaHuWaH

      Delete
  15. I also say Yehuweh based on ancient hebrew reconstruction. [I enjoy the language reconstruction from http://ieue.org IEUE Research Centre. It is fun to use because there is no need for vowel points. It might be based somewhat on Greek pronuciation, but she in NO way advocates the pronunciation Yahweh. She states how this rendering of the name is close to the name for Jupiter and thus pagan.] The Aramaic Peshitta is a wonderful translation. I think that second peter three ten should translate as "revealed" or "exposed" rather than burned up. The works of the righteous are not burned up, but the works of wickedness and of the Fallen Watchers and Nephillim are as they have no place in His kingdom. The earth will have to be cleansed before the millennium of all of this mess.

    ReplyDelete
  16. @ DoublePortionInheritance: Can you please tell me what got you to change from referring to God as YHWH and Jesus Christ as Y'shua the Anointed? I am curious because at one point I myself starting referring to them as those names and then was told that was not of 'God' and to stop. I just want to truth...

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Dear Maria, I never had a sister (you are a mother,daughter,and a sister) I will call you "my sister"!

    If ALL these writings are yours---what a wonderful "blessing" you have received --- no one has summarized so

    much in so little and so clear English--- a most remarkable manifestation of a female language inspired blessed brain!

    Truly most refreshing for the obtuse brain of us males. (an even worse affliction for the female brain)

    Some are easily swayed by one attack and many I welcome. Especially the one 'lisadf' found "It makes illogical jumps

    faster than lightning from 'fremasonary' and ancient false religions to stick with the 'covered up name'

    HalleluYAH (notice no J) for ALL your summarized writings I am 'searching and scrutinizing'(knowledge of YHWH in

    Daniel 12:4 where the words and the book were sealed up until this time of the end ON THE INTERNET NOW.

    You have certainly got it right. (getNAMEright)

    Soo much has been covered up you are doing so well --- thanks especially on the article on HE is ONE.

    Finally I would like to thank 'lisadf' for also inspiring me to rarely answer and please "my sister" --- "write more"?

    Soo kool are they who think continually on HIS NAME. Way to Go!

    Shalom and getNAMEright (UaV)-(Udun de YrDs)-(Ino)-(Uc)-(Ic)-(SoduzHE) and (Hl)---( He laughs)

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Lisa, I never use the internet for answers to important questions that I have. Our Messiah told us that the Ruwach ha'Qodesh (Holy Spirit) is our teacher and he said that we do not need to be taught by men! So when I need answers, I fast and pray and seek the face of YaHuWaH! And guess what? YaHuWaH taught me his name through dreams, visions, study, prayer etc. That website "Jesus is Savior" is wrong about the sacred name! They have some things correct, but on the name they are 1000% wrong!!!! Trust in YaHuWaH not in man! Jeremiah 17:5 says "cursed be the man that puts his trust in man." If you seek all of your answers from human sources, you are showing that you do not trust in YaHuWaH, and you are under a curse. I only use human sources as CONFIRMATION of what YaHuWaH has already spoken to me in prayer.

    ReplyDelete