Click image to donate

Click image to donate
Click Image to Donate: DoublePortionInheritance@gmail.com

Friday, February 3, 2012

The King of Tyre & Babylon, Lucifer & Satan

By Maria Merola  

© Copyright Double Portion Inheritance, September 2004  
http://www.DoublePortionInheritance.com

In Isaiah 14 & Ezekiel 28, we see prophecies that seem to be referring to the King of Babylon (Nimrod & Nebuchadnezzar) and also the Prince of Tyre. But even though these two prophecies seem to be describing an earthly king, we know from reading Daniel 10:13-20 that for every “ground prince” there is a ruling demon prince (a principality) or a fallen angel. 

Hence, the fallen one spoken of in Isaiah 14 & Ezekiel 28 is indeed Satan who also possessed Nimrod, Nebuchadnezzar, and the Prince of Tyre. There is a very close similarity to Isaiah 14 & Ezekiel 28 which shows us that these prophecies are about Satan himself as well as the earthly vessels who were being used to carry out his evil plans. Let us examine these two prophecies in the Authorized King James Version. I have updated the archaic words and restored the sacred names in the KJV verses below: 

Yeshayahuw (Isaiah) 14:

13 For you have said in your heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of Elohiym: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: 

14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.

Yechezqel (Ezekiel )28: 

1 The word of YHWH came again unto me, saying, 

2 Son of man, say unto the prince of Tyrus, Thus says YHWH Elohiym; Because your heart is lifted up, and you have said, I am an ElohiymI sit in the seat of Elohiym, in the midst of the seas; yet you are a man, and not Elohiym, though you set your heart as the heart of Elohiym:

What we see here in Ezekiel 28 is that the Prince of Tyrus was seen in the Garden of Eden:

Yechezqel (Ezekiel )28: 

12 Son of man, take up a lamentation upon the king of Tyrus, and say unto him, Thus says YHWH Elohiym; You seal up the sum, full of wisdom, and perfect in beauty. 

13 You have been in Eden the garden of Elohiym; every precious stone was your covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of your tabrets and of your pipes was prepared in you in the day that you were created. 

14 You are the anointed cherub that covers; and I have set you so: you were upon the holy mountain of Elohiym you have walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire. 

15 You were perfect in your ways from the day that you were created, till iniquity was found in you.

We can see that the Prince of Tyrus (possessed by Satan) was also the one who possessed the Prince of Babylon as well. This is why Ezekiel said that he was in the Garden of Eden! 

Similarly, in the prophecy in Isaiah 14:12, we know that this is primarily about King Nebuchadnezzar who ruled in the days of the prophet Isaiah. But with all prophecy, we can see that history repeats itself and Nimrod, (who was also the first King of Babylon) is also described in Isaiah 14 as well. Nimrod was “cut down to the ground like an abominable branch” (Isaiah 14:19) as we read about the way that he was killed in the book of Yasher (Jasher) chapter 27. 

This is why in Ezekiel 8:17, we read that the people were adopting the pagan custom of “putting the branch to the nose,” which was an act of worship for Nimrod who was worshiped as “Baal, the god of the tree.” 

In Jeremiah 10, we read about a vain custom where the people were cutting down trees from the forest and decorating it with silver and gold. This custom first began in Ancient Babylon as a memorial for Nimrod because he was cut down like a tree. His body parts were chopped of like limbs to a tree and these body parts were delivered to all ten provinces in the Land of Shinar as an example to those who sacrificed infants to Molech.

According to some historians, Nimrod was killed by a bounty hunt put out by Shem, (the son of Noah). But it was Esau (the twin brother of Jacob) who actually shot the arrow that killed Nimrod (according to the book of Jasher). 

Both Nimrod and Nebuchadnezzar were kings of Babylon whose bodies were being used as a host to carry out the evil schemes of the kingdom of darkness. But we also know that Isaiah 14:12 is about Satan, because the King of Babylon never went to heaven, nor did he ever fall from heaven: 

Yeshayahuw (Isaiah) 14:12 How are you fallen from heaven, O Heylel (Lucifer), son of the morning! how are you cut down to the ground, which did weaken the nations!

Our Messiah saw Satan fall from heaven, so we know that the only person that Isaiah 14:12 could be speaking of is Satan!

Luqas (Luke) 10:18 And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.

The name ”Lucifer is a Latin translation for the Hebrew name “Heylelwhich simply means “light bringer.” Both the Latin name Lucifer and the Hebrew name Heylel mean the very same thing. You see, before Satan fell from heaven, he was a worship leader at the throne in heaven as we have seen in Ezekiel 28:13-14. This is why his name means “light bringer, shining one.” But after his fall, he lost his light. He was no longer called “Heylelafter his fall. His name was called “Beelzebubby our Messiah in Matthew 10:25, Matthew 12:24-27; Mark 3:22 & Luke 11:15-19. 

What does the name “Beelzebubmean?

In the Greek Strong’s Concordance, it is seen as follows:

#954. Beelzeboul beh-el-zeb-ool’ of Chaldee origin (by parody on 1176); dung-god; Beelzebul, a name of Satan:--Beelzebub; a name of Satan, the prince of evil spirits; “lord of the house.”

But as you can see, it references the Hebrew word #1176:

#1176 Ba`al Zbuwb bah’-al zeb-oob’ from 1168 and 2070; Baal of (the) Fly; Baal-Zebub, a special deity of the Ekronites:--Baal-zebub.

So you see, he was once a worship leader in heaven, but now his name literally means “lord of the flies” or “Baal of the flies!”

Now, let us take a look at this word for heylel:

#1966 heylel hay-lale’ from 1984 (in the sense of brightness); -Lucifer.

*Note: this word “heylel” comes from another root word:

#1984 halal haw-lal’ a primitive root; to be clear; to shine; hence, to make a show, to boast; and thus to be (clamorously) foolish; to rave; causatively, to celebrate; also to stultify:--(make) boast (self), commend, (deal, make), fool (- ish, -ly), glory, give (light), be (make, feign self) mad (against), give in marriage, (sing, be worthy of) praise, rage, renowned, shine.

Another derivative of this word is as follows:

#1974 hilluwl hil-lool’ from 1984 (in the sense of rejoicing); a celebration of thanksgiving for harvest:--merry, praise.

*Note: this word “hilluwl is where we get the term “HalleluYah.” It means “to praise.”

In Psalm 106:1, we see the phrase “Praise you, Yah” or in the King James Version “Praise ye the LORD.”

But in Hebrew, this phrase is “Halal Yahh.”

Now, some of these anti-sacred name Christian groups will try to use this as so-called “proof” that the name our Creator “Yah” or YaHuWaH is a code name for Satan! But all it proves is that Satan was once a “covering cherub” who used to “praise Yah” at the throne!

The Hebrew term “Heylel Ben Shachar” means “son of the morning,” which indicates that he was just a “son” (a created being) and that the Messiah (The Morning Star) created him. The Greek Septuagint inaccurately translates this in Isaiah 14:12 as “The Morning Star,” insinuating that it was Yahuwshuwa (aka Jesus) who fell from heaven.

You see, the title “The Bright and Morning Star,” in Revelation 22:16 is reserved for Yahuwshuwa Mashiyach (Messiah) alone.  The Greek Septuagint translates this as if it said in Hebrew: “Boker Kokab” (Morning Star). In Job 3This was done deliberately in order to make people believe that our Messiah, Yahuwshuwa is also the fallen angel Lucifer or Heylel!

Many people have been confused over this one verse in Isaiah 14;12, and they begin to question the identity of our Messiah. I have seen Orthodox Jews use the Septuagint to convert people away from our Messiah with this one verse in Isaiah 14:12 from the Septuagint! 

That is why I use the Hebrew Masoretic Text which is what the King James Version uses. In the 3rd Century, the Roman Emperor Constantine hired Eusebeus (a bishop of Cesarea) to make fifty Bibles for him in Latin Vulgate.  But instead of using the original Hebrew Tanakah (Old Testament), he used the corrupted Greek Septuagint which was transcribed by Clement & Origen, two men from the Gnostic School of Alexandria. These men did not believe that our Messiah, Yahuwshuwa is YaHuWaH (the Father) come to us in human flesh, so they removed the verses that they did not like from the Hebrew text, and this is how the Greek Septuagint was formed.

The Septuagint did not go into print until the 2nd Century A.D. (contrary to popular belief). The Vatican has propagated a lie (in order to defend the Catholic Bible’s legitimacy) and they make all scholars in their Jesuit propaganda believe that the Septuagint pre-dates our Messiah. But this is a lie. The Septuagint only goes back to 2nd Century Gnosticism. Here is evidence based on a letter from a man named Aristeas that shows that the historic events mentioned in this letter did not happen until the 2nd Century proving that the Septuagint is a Gnostic Conspiracy Hoax in order to discredit the deity of our Messiah:


Some people argue that the Latin name Lucifer was added to the text in Isaiah 14:12 by King James translators. Well this is absolutely true!

However, even though it was added to the text, the King James translators let us know that it was not part of the original text by placing the name Lucifer in italics. Whenever we see words in italics in the King James Version, it means that the word was not there in the text originally. 

The Latin name Lucifer is just another way of calling Satan a fallen star or a fallen angel. The Hebrew text does not use the Latin name Lucifer, but the word Heylel in Hebrew does mean the very same thing which is “light bringer, shining one.”

The Apostle Sha’ul said that Satan can transform himself as an “angel of light” in 2nd Corinthians 11:14. The brightest star in our solar system is the sun, which is why Malachi 4:2,  calls our Messiah “the sun of righteousness.” Satan wants to be the brightest star (the sun) or “the morning star” and so he has tricked people into worshiping the the sun through pagan sun-god worship holidays like Christmas, Easter, Halloween, Valentines Day etc. The pagans worship the created object of the sun instead of the one who created the sun (Messiah). 

We read in Colossians 1:16 that our Messiah is the creator of all things both in heaven and in earth. This means that he even created Satan who was once a “covering cherub” at the throne in heaven. Satan was like one of the stars before his fall and Messiah watched him fall:

Luqas (Luke) 10:18 And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.

Some people within the Messianic & Hebraic Roots Community have tried to suggest that there is no real entity called “Satan.” They say that the word for Satan in Hebrew is not even a proper name, but a term that simple refers to the “Yetzer Hara” meaning “evil inclination.”

But there are actually two different words for Satan in the Hebrew Concordance. You will see that one reference is a verb which means “to accuse or attack.” But the other word for Satan is a proper name which means “the arch enemy of good, the adversary.” Below are these words from the Concordance:

#7853 satan saw-tan’ a primitive root; to attack, (figuratively) accuse:--(be an) adversary, resist.

#7854 satan saw-tawn’ from 7853; an opponent; especially (with the article prefixed) Satan, the arch-enemy of good:--adversary, Satan, withstand.

Also, in Luke 10:18, where Yahuwshuwa said that he saw Satan fall as lightning, we would have to believe that the “evil inclination” had fallen like lightning, and we know that has not happened yet, because the evil inclination is still evident to this day in people.

In the final analysis, I believe that Lucifer or “light bringer” (Heylel) was the former name of the malak (angel) who was once the worship leader in the shamayim (heaven). 

But since Satan can transform himself as an “angel of light,” (even though he is now a fallen angel), he still tries to portray himself as “the light bringer, the shining one.”

But he has no light left in him. He is trying to portray himself as such but he has fallen. And his hosts such as Nebuchadnezzar & Nimrod (kings of Babylon) and also the Prince of Tyrus are human vessels through which he operated. The prophecies in Isaiah 14 & Ezekiel 28 both speak in figurative language of these earthly kings, but also of the one who possessed these kings which is the former Lucifer, Heylel
who is now called Satan, the Serpent, the Dragon, Beelzebub.

Twelve years after I published this article in a blog, I found another witness to what I have written by David W. Daniels at this website:

Should the Bible Say “Lucifer” or “Morning Star” in Isaiah 14:12? 


© 2002 by David W. Daniels

4 comments:

  1. Thank you, great post. By the way, I discovered your post because of the picture. I have it posted on my blog in an article called an interview with nimrod. You can see it at http://jangrace.com/an-interview-with-nimrod

    Would it be alright if I kept the picture posted? Thank you. Jan

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello Jan Grace, yes the picture is not mine, so you are free to use it as it is public domain, so long as you don't use it for making profit.

    Shalom,

    Maria

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am greatly inspired by your posts and thinking of writing mine now. Thanks for being an inspiration to me as I was also trying to write blogs but was not getting the appropriate genre.

    wheel alignment christchurch

    ReplyDelete
  4. Have you been in associate Have you been in associate degree instance wherever you have got had a vehicle bother and you required anyone to repair it? Most individuals had at just the once.

    degree instance wherever you have got had a vehicle bother and you required anyone to repair it? Most individuals had at just the once.

    ReplyDelete